I told you, the mane is for attracting lion chicks. I offer them hair. You offer them a tomato. Which makes more sense (assuming we're not talking about starving women)? (Or could it be that we're both wrong and that there is some deeper evolutionary purpose at work? Does your tomato need hair? Does my mane need a tomato?))
And does anyone understand this 'Comment Back' thing? There's no help page under 'Help'.
No one has fielded my "mane" question. Damn, I'm going to stop asking questions about evolution is nobody ever even attempts an answer. Here, let's make it easier. Which of these things would most apply to the Lions mane?
A. Creationsim - god wanted something as a grip when picking up lions.
B. Intelligent Design - by Coco Chanel; for the incredible look on that very special night.
Nathan Young That's true Jonathan Brown. At one time I was a member of the MRA board when it was more open towards hearing an orthodox Mormon views on things. Since that time the MRA is now under the stewardship of a new 'religion' the 'Society for Humanistic Mormonism' which is merely another apostate religion. It will fail just like all other apostate forms of Mormonism have failed including might I add the Mormon "Transhumanist" Association and their kind, and all the front…
Hello fellow atheists! I have joined this site in an attempt to find other rational individuals, such as myself, and to promote a current charity drive that I am trying to get going for the Oklahoma tornado victims. I have managed to get many groups from around my area, including the Beyond Belief Foundation to back me on this endeavor.
I am located in Newnan, Ga and have my own atheist group entitled "Coweta County Atheists". I am currently being backed by Spaulding Co.…